Chile vs South Africa: Government spending vs. GDP, per square kilometre

Chile
62,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
59,209 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
86th
South Africa rank
89th

Government spending vs. GDP, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • South Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 62,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 59,209 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 2,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 86th and South Africa ranks 89th of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 10,421 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,411 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 16,594 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 189.69 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 17,305 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,864 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,560 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 21,782 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,657 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,875 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 29,207 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,787 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,580 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 44,298 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 53,558 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,261 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 57,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 58,098 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 679.48 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government spending vs. gdp, per square kilometre, Chile or South Africa?
Chile, at 62,024 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 59,209 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in government spending vs. gdp, per square kilometre between Chile and South Africa?
2,815 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for government spending vs. gdp, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 86th and South Africa ranks 89th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Government spending vs. GDP, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs South Africa: Government spending vs. GDP, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/government-spending-vs-gdp-per-square-kilometre/chile/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/government-spending-vs-gdp-per-square-kilometre/chile/south-africa/">Chile vs South Africa: Government spending vs. GDP, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government spending vs. GDP, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,600 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Government spending vs. GDP divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.