Kazakhstan vs Philippines: Central government revenues as a share of GDP
Kazakhstan
16.5%
in 2023
Philippines
16.7%
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
123rd
Philippines rank
121st
Central government revenues as a share of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 16.7% against 16.5% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Philippines ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 123rd and Philippines ranks 121st of 157 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.2% | 15.3% | 4.1% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 13.0% | 13.7% | 0.7% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 18.2% | 14.4% | 3.8% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 14.4% | 15.8% | 1.4% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher central government revenues as a share of gdp, Kazakhstan or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 16.7% against 16.5% in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in central government revenues as a share of gdp between Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 0.2%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Philippines?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Philippines rank globally for central government revenues as a share of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 123rd and Philippines ranks 121st of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) Government Finance Statistics, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Central government revenues as a share of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes, social contributions, and other revenues such as fines, fees, rent, and income from property or sales included. Grants excluded.