Korea vs Lithuania: Government debt by instrument coverage — Debt securities and loans

Korea
45.57 Percentage of GDP
in 2024
Lithuania
42.01 Percentage of GDP
in 2026
Korea rank
2nd
Lithuania rank
5th

Government debt by instrument coverage — Debt securities and loans over time

  • Korea
  • Lithuania
1020304050199520102026

How they compare

Korea currently reports 45.57 Percentage of GDP against 42.01 Percentage of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 3.56 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Lithuania ahead.

Korea ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 5th of 2 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 33.35 Percentage of GDP 37.96 Percentage of GDP 4.62 Percentage of GDP Lithuania
2020s 44.68 Percentage of GDP 38.48 Percentage of GDP 6.2 Percentage of GDP Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government debt by instrument coverage — debt securities and loans, Korea or Lithuania?
Korea, at 45.57 Percentage of GDP against 42.01 Percentage of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in government debt by instrument coverage — debt securities and loans between Korea and Lithuania?
3.56 Percentage of GDP, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Lithuania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Korea and Lithuania rank globally for government debt by instrument coverage — debt securities and loans?
Korea ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 5th of 2 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Government debt by instrument coverage — Debt securities and loans. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Lithuania: Government debt by instrument coverage — Debt securities and loans. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/government-debt-by-instrument-coverage-debt-securities-and-loans/korea/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/government-debt-by-instrument-coverage-debt-securities-and-loans/korea/lithuania-2/">Korea vs Lithuania: Government debt by instrument coverage — Debt securities and loans</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government debt by instrument coverage — Debt securities and loans
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
34 places, 935 data points, 1995–2026
Last refreshed

The magnitude of government debt and debt-to-GDP ratios varies depending on which measure of debt is used. To promote international comparability, the IMF, the OECD and the World Bank have agreed on a set of standard debt measures, which are defined in the Public Sector Debt Statistics Guide for Compilers and Users and the Government Finance Statistics Manual 2014. Government gross debt is shown in four categories: D1 to D4. D1 is the narrowest measure, comprising only two financial instruments: debt securities and loans. D4 (‘total gross debt’) is the broadest measure and includes debt securities, loans, Special Drawing Rights, currency and deposits, other accounts payable and insurance, pensions and standardised guarantees. The D1 to D3 measures are comparable between OECD countries. D4 is the preferred measure of debt in the international accounting standards (System of National Accounts or SNA) but cross-country comparability is more difficult for D4 because countries have different approaches to recording unfunded pension liabilities for government employees. For more information, please see the document: Measuring Government Debt: D1-D4