Malta vs OECD members: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
23.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
390,942 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
7th
OECD members rank
5th

Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • OECD members
010.0M20.0M30.0M197119972023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 23.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 390,942 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 22.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 59.2 times OECD members's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 5th of 198 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.47 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23,129 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.44 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 2.72 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 43,788 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.68 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 7.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 92,087 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.04 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 11.92 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 193,609 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.73 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 16.43 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 296,136 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16.14 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 20.76 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 362,518 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 20.39 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or OECD members?
Malta, at 23.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 390,942 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and OECD members?
22.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and OECD members?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Malta and OECD members rank globally for goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 5th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs OECD members: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/">Malta vs OECD members: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,350 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.