Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Low & middle income
95,758 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
2.95 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
23rd
Mauritius rank
26th

Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Mauritius
01.0M2.0M3.0M197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 2.95 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 95,758 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 2.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 30.8 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 26th of 47 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Mauritius Difference Ahead
1980s 4,374 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 345,178 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 340,805 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 9,257 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 876,994 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 867,738 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 27,139 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.40 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.38 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 65,735 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.46 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.40 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 88,234 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.56 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.47 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Low & middle income or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 2.95 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 95,758 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Low & middle income and Mauritius?
2.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Mauritius?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Mauritius rank globally for goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Low & middle income ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 26th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/mauritius/">Low & middle income vs Mauritius: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,350 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.