High income vs Malta: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

High income
298,751 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
23.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
8th
Malta rank
7th

Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • High income
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M197119972023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 23.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 298,751 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 22.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 77.5 times High income's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 8th and Malta ranks 7th of 47 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 26,563 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.47 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.44 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 50,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.72 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.67 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 76,953 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.06 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 147,792 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.92 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 231,516 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16.43 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16.20 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 279,384 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 20.76 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 20.48 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, High income or Malta?
Malta, at 23.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 298,751 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between High income and Malta?
22.86 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Malta?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do High income and Malta rank globally for goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
High income ranks 8th and Malta ranks 7th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Malta: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/high-income/malta/">High income vs Malta: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,350 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.