Eswatini vs Saudi Arabia: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
108,282 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
88,352 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
120th
Saudi Arabia rank
123rd

Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Saudi Arabia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k197119972023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 108,282 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 88,352 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 19,930 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 120th and Saudi Arabia ranks 123rd of 198 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1970s 11,527 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,860 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,667 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 24,604 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,459 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,145 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 50,275 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,873 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 38,402 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 86,607 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 25,399 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 61,208 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 98,990 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 61,994 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 36,996 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 105,619 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 72,882 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 32,737 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Saudi Arabia?
Eswatini, at 108,282 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 88,352 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Saudi Arabia?
19,930 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saudi Arabia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Saudi Arabia rank globally for goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 120th and Saudi Arabia ranks 123rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Saudi Arabia: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/saudi-arabia/">Eswatini vs Saudi Arabia: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,350 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.