Denmark vs Low & middle income: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Denmark
3.23 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
95,758 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
23rd
Low & middle income rank
23rd

Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Low & middle income
01.0M2.0M3.0M197519992023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 3.23 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 95,758 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 3.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 33.7 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 23rd and Low & middle income ranks 23rd of 198 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1980s 518,251 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,374 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 513,877 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 942,784 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,257 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 933,527 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 1.77 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,139 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 2.43 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 65,735 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.37 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 3.10 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 88,234 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.02 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Denmark or Low & middle income?
Denmark, at 3.23 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 95,758 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Denmark and Low & middle income?
3.13 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Low & middle income?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Low & middle income rank globally for goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 23rd and Low & middle income ranks 23rd of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Low & middle income: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/low-and-middle-income/">Denmark vs Low & middle income: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,350 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.