Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Bahamas
407,073 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
431,827 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
74th
Costa Rica rank
71st

Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Costa Rica
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197619992023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 431,827 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 407,073 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 24,754 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 74th and Costa Rica ranks 71st of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 5 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1970s 48,478 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,381 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 90,116 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22,131 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 67,985 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 123,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 57,507 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 65,607 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 230,144 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 151,372 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 78,772 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 304,430 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 281,361 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 330,726 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 367,058 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 36,332 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 431,827 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 407,073 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Costa Rica?
24,754 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Costa Rica?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Costa Rica rank globally for goods imports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 74th and Costa Rica ranks 71st of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-imports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/costa-rica/">Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods imports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,350 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods imports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.