Papua New Guinea vs Senegal: Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
28,334 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
28,673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
143rd
Senegal rank
141st

Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Senegal
010.0k20.0k30.0k197419982023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 28,673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,334 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 339 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Senegal ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 143rd and Senegal ranks 141st of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Senegal Difference Ahead
1970s 1,633 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,823 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,191 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1980s 2,280 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,314 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,034 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 4,620 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,714 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 93.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2000s 7,259 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,779 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 519.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2010s 17,619 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,934 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,685 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 26,147 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,504 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,357 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Senegal?
Senegal, at 28,673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,334 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Senegal?
339 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Senegal?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Senegal rank globally for goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 143rd and Senegal ranks 141st of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Senegal: Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-exports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-exports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/senegal/">Papua New Guinea vs Senegal: Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,219 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods exports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.