Malta vs OECD members: Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
13.34 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
370,751 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
7th
OECD members rank
5th

Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • OECD members
05.0M10.0M15.0M197119972023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 13.34 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 370,751 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 12.97 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 36.0 times OECD members's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 5th of 198 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 1.09 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23,966 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.07 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 1.75 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 41,944 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.71 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 5.12 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 92,144 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5.03 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 8.78 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 181,124 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8.60 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 11.27 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 283,013 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10.98 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 12.57 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 342,378 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12.23 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or OECD members?
Malta, at 13.34 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 370,751 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and OECD members?
12.97 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and OECD members?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Malta and OECD members rank globally for goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 7th and OECD members ranks 5th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs OECD members: Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-exports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/goods-exports-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/">Malta vs OECD members: Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,219 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Goods exports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.