Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Equatorial Guinea
6,250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Namibia
5,741 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
183rd
Namibia rank
186th
Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Namibia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 6,250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,741 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 509 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 183rd and Namibia ranks 186th of 198 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 6,250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 5,741 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 1996.
- What is the difference in goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 509 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1996.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for goods exports (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 183rd and Namibia ranks 186th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Goods exports (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goods exports (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.