Latvia vs Zambia: GNI, PPP

Latvia
84.52 billion current international $
in 2025
Zambia
87.44 billion current international $
in 2025
Latvia rank
109th
Zambia rank
106th

GNI, PPP over time

  • Latvia
  • Zambia
20.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B199020072025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 87.44 billion current international $ against 84.52 billion current international $ in Latvia, a difference of 2.92 billion current international $.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 109th and Zambia ranks 106th of 202 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 15.35 billion current international $ 12.65 billion current international $ 2.70 billion current international $ Latvia
2000s 27.64 billion current international $ 24.45 billion current international $ 3.19 billion current international $ Latvia
2010s 45.30 billion current international $ 52.49 billion current international $ 7.19 billion current international $ Zambia
2020s 74.70 billion current international $ 73.53 billion current international $ 1.18 billion current international $ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp, Latvia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 87.44 billion current international $ against 84.52 billion current international $ in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, ppp between Latvia and Zambia?
2.92 billion current international $, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for gni, ppp?
Latvia ranks 109th and Zambia ranks 106th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), published as GNI, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zambia: GNI, PPP. Statizoid, drawing on International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international/latvia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international/latvia/zambia/">Latvia vs Zambia: GNI, PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $)
Unit
current international $
Source
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
249 places, 8,492 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator provides values for gross national income (GNI) expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.