IDA blend vs Sweden: GNI, PPP

IDA blend
5.43 trillion current international $
in 2025
Sweden
806.30 billion current international $
in 2025
IDA blend rank
36th
Sweden rank
41st

GNI, PPP over time

  • IDA blend
  • Sweden
02.0T4.0T6.0T199020072025

How they compare

IDA blend currently reports 5.43 trillion current international $ against 806.30 billion current international $ in Sweden, a difference of 4.63 trillion current international $.

That makes IDA blend's figure about 6.7 times Sweden's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, IDA blend has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 41st of 45 groups.

IDA blend has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 2.05 trillion current international $ 390.90 billion current international $ 1.65 trillion current international $ IDA blend
2010s 2.96 trillion current international $ 484.55 billion current international $ 2.47 trillion current international $ IDA blend
2020s 4.59 trillion current international $ 727.51 billion current international $ 3.86 trillion current international $ IDA blend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp, IDA blend or Sweden?
IDA blend, at 5.43 trillion current international $ against 806.30 billion current international $ in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, ppp between IDA blend and Sweden?
4.63 trillion current international $, with IDA blend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Sweden?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do IDA blend and Sweden rank globally for gni, ppp?
IDA blend ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 41st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), published as GNI, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Sweden: GNI, PPP. Statizoid, drawing on International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international/ida-blend/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international/ida-blend/sweden/">IDA blend vs Sweden: GNI, PPP</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $)
Unit
current international $
Source
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
249 places, 8,492 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator provides values for gross national income (GNI) expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.