Laos vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): GNI, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP

Laos
4.22 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
3.36 current international $ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Laos rank
10th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
11th

GNI, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP over time

  • Laos
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
23456199020072025

How they compare

Laos currently reports 4.22 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 3.36 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.86 current international $ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Laos's figure about 1.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Laos ahead.

Laos ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 203 countries.

Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 4.62 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.79 current international $ per US$ of GDP 1.82 current international $ per US$ of GDP Laos
2000s 4.96 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.97 current international $ per US$ of GDP 1.99 current international $ per US$ of GDP Laos
2010s 2.83 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.33 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.4961 current international $ per US$ of GDP Laos
2020s 3.76 current international $ per US$ of GDP 2.97 current international $ per US$ of GDP 0.7915 current international $ per US$ of GDP Laos

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp, Laos or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Laos, at 4.22 current international $ per US$ of GDP against 3.36 current international $ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp between Laos and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.86 current international $ per US$ of GDP, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Laos and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per unit of gdp?
Laos ranks 10th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Laos vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): GNI, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of-gdp/lao-pdr/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-unit-of-gdp/lao-pdr/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Laos vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): GNI, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per unit of GDP
Unit
current international $ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 8,497 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.