Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

Montenegro
1.49 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
1.62 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro rank
96th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
93rd

GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Montenegro
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199020062023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.62 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.49 million current international $ per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 126,370 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 96th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 93rd of 200 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 575,567 current international $ per square kilometre 491,360 current international $ per square kilometre 84,207 current international $ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 798,907 current international $ per square kilometre 693,487 current international $ per square kilometre 105,420 current international $ per square kilometre Montenegro
2020s 1.23 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.45 million current international $ per square kilometre 223,924 current international $ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, Montenegro or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.62 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.49 million current international $ per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
126,370 current international $ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
Montenegro ranks 96th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 93rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/">Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 7,887 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.