Equatorial Guinea vs New Zealand: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.05 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
116th
New Zealand rank
115th

GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • New Zealand
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M199020062023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.05 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 29,350 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and New Zealand ranks 115th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 44,252 current international $ per square kilometre 224,670 current international $ per square kilometre 180,417 current international $ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 439,790 current international $ per square kilometre 381,723 current international $ per square kilometre 58,067 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 873,818 current international $ per square kilometre 640,733 current international $ per square kilometre 233,086 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 919,874 current international $ per square kilometre 957,162 current international $ per square kilometre 37,289 current international $ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.05 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and New Zealand?
29,350 current international $ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and New Zealand rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th and New Zealand ranks 115th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs New Zealand: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/new-zealand/">Equatorial Guinea vs New Zealand: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 7,887 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.