Colombia vs Equatorial Guinea: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

Colombia
981,767 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
117th
Equatorial Guinea rank
116th

GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Equatorial Guinea
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M199020062023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre against 981,767 current international $ per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 42,183 current international $ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 192,717 current international $ per square kilometre 44,252 current international $ per square kilometre 148,465 current international $ per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 310,038 current international $ per square kilometre 439,790 current international $ per square kilometre 129,752 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 554,955 current international $ per square kilometre 873,818 current international $ per square kilometre 318,864 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 854,239 current international $ per square kilometre 919,874 current international $ per square kilometre 65,634 current international $ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, Colombia or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.02 million current international $ per square kilometre against 981,767 current international $ per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between Colombia and Equatorial Guinea?
42,183 current international $ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Equatorial Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 117th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 116th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Equatorial Guinea: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/colombia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/colombia/equatorial-guinea/">Colombia vs Equatorial Guinea: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 7,887 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.