Central African Republic vs Mauritania: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
11,020 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
33,999 current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
199th
Mauritania rank
198th

GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mauritania
010.0k20.0k30.0k199020062023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 33,999 current international $ per square kilometre against 11,020 current international $ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 22,979 current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 3.1 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 199th and Mauritania ranks 198th of 200 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s 3,203 current international $ per square kilometre 4,875 current international $ per square kilometre 1,671 current international $ per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 4,898 current international $ per square kilometre 7,980 current international $ per square kilometre 3,082 current international $ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 6,775 current international $ per square kilometre 16,174 current international $ per square kilometre 9,399 current international $ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 10,123 current international $ per square kilometre 29,042 current international $ per square kilometre 18,919 current international $ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 33,999 current international $ per square kilometre against 11,020 current international $ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Mauritania?
22,979 current international $ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mauritania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Mauritania rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 199th and Mauritania ranks 198th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mauritania: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mauritania/">Central African Republic vs Mauritania: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 7,887 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.