Aruba vs Europe & Central Asia: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre

Aruba
25.96 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia
1.69 million current international $ per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
15th
Europe & Central Asia rank
12th

GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Europe & Central Asia
010.0M20.0M30.0M199020062023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 25.96 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.69 million current international $ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 24.27 million current international $ per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 15.4 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 15th and Europe & Central Asia ranks 12th of 200 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Europe & Central Asia Difference Ahead
1990s 10.88 million current international $ per square kilometre 702,336 current international $ per square kilometre 10.18 million current international $ per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 17.20 million current international $ per square kilometre 653,604 current international $ per square kilometre 16.55 million current international $ per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 20.27 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.04 million current international $ per square kilometre 19.24 million current international $ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 21.78 million current international $ per square kilometre 1.50 million current international $ per square kilometre 20.29 million current international $ per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre, Aruba or Europe & Central Asia?
Aruba, at 25.96 million current international $ per square kilometre against 1.69 million current international $ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre between Aruba and Europe & Central Asia?
24.27 million current international $ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Europe & Central Asia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Europe & Central Asia rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 15th and Europe & Central Asia ranks 12th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Europe & Central Asia: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/aruba/europe-and-central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-square-kilometre/aruba/europe-and-central-asia/">Aruba vs Europe & Central Asia: GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per square kilometre
Unit
current international $ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 7,887 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.