Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita

Slovenia
58,878 current international $ per person
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
5,616 current international $ per person
in 2025
Slovenia rank
38th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
39th

GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita over time

  • Slovenia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020072025

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 58,878 current international $ per person against 5,616 current international $ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 53,262 current international $ per person.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 10.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 39th of 203 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 13,771 current international $ per person 2,076 current international $ per person 11,695 current international $ per person Slovenia
2000s 23,038 current international $ per person 2,806 current international $ per person 20,232 current international $ per person Slovenia
2010s 32,227 current international $ per person 3,959 current international $ per person 28,267 current international $ per person Slovenia
2020s 51,679 current international $ per person 5,009 current international $ per person 46,671 current international $ per person Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per capita, Slovenia or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Slovenia, at 58,878 current international $ per person against 5,616 current international $ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per capita between Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
53,262 current international $ per person, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per capita?
Slovenia ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 39th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-capita/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-capita/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita
Unit
current international $ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 8,510 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.