Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita

Lithuania
55,015 current international $ per person
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
5,616 current international $ per person
in 2025
Lithuania rank
41st
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
39th

GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020072025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 55,015 current international $ per person against 5,616 current international $ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 49,399 current international $ per person.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 9.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 39th of 203 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 6,729 current international $ per person 2,076 current international $ per person 4,653 current international $ per person Lithuania
2000s 13,389 current international $ per person 2,806 current international $ per person 10,583 current international $ per person Lithuania
2010s 27,096 current international $ per person 3,959 current international $ per person 23,136 current international $ per person Lithuania
2020s 48,938 current international $ per person 5,009 current international $ per person 43,929 current international $ per person Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni, ppp (current international $), per capita, Lithuania or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Lithuania, at 55,015 current international $ per person against 5,616 current international $ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni, ppp (current international $), per capita between Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
49,399 current international $ per person, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for gni, ppp (current international $), per capita?
Lithuania ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 39th of 203 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-capita/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-ppp-current-international-per-capita/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI, PPP (current international $), per capita
Unit
current international $ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
250 places, 8,510 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

GNI, PPP (current international $) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.