Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Aruba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 23,108 US$ against 22,746 US$ in Aruba, a difference of 362 US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 44th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 42nd of 206 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27,653 US$ | 27,418 US$ | 235.67 US$ | Aruba |
| 2020s | 22,746 US$ | 23,108 US$ | 361.3 US$ | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 23,108 US$ against 22,746 US$ in Aruba as of 2020.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 362 US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gni per capita?
- Aruba ranks 44th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 42nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as GNI per capita (US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
GNI per capita is gross national income divided by midyear population. GNI (formerly GNP) is the sum of value added by all resident producers plus any product taxes (less subsidies) not included in the valuation of output plus net receipts of primary income (compensation of employees and property income) from abroad. Data are in current U.S. dollars.