Israel vs Japan: GNI per capita, PPP
GNI per capita, PPP over time
- Israel
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 58,920 current international $ against 58,870 current international $ in Israel, a difference of 50 current international $.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Israel ranks 39th and Japan ranks 37th of 202 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,442 current international $ | 24,039 current international $ | 4,597 current international $ | Japan |
| 2000s | 26,192 current international $ | 32,406 current international $ | 6,214 current international $ | Japan |
| 2010s | 35,701 current international $ | 41,631 current international $ | 5,930 current international $ | Japan |
| 2020s | 51,855 current international $ | 52,922 current international $ | 1,067 current international $ | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, ppp, Israel or Japan?
- Japan, at 58,920 current international $ against 58,870 current international $ in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita, ppp between Israel and Japan?
- 50 current international $, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Japan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Japan rank globally for gni per capita, ppp?
- Israel ranks 39th and Japan ranks 37th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), published as GNI per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator provides values for gross national income (GNI) per person expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.