Chile vs Montenegro: GNI per capita, PPP
GNI per capita, PPP over time
- Chile
- Montenegro
How they compare
Chile currently reports 35,730 current international $ against 35,700 current international $ in Montenegro, a difference of 30 current international $.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 69th and Montenegro ranks 70th of 202 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,497 current international $ | 6,180 current international $ | 2,317 current international $ | Chile |
| 2000s | 11,959 current international $ | 9,557 current international $ | 2,402 current international $ | Chile |
| 2010s | 21,489 current international $ | 17,218 current international $ | 4,271 current international $ | Chile |
| 2020s | 30,420 current international $ | 29,265 current international $ | 1,155 current international $ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, ppp, Chile or Montenegro?
- Chile, at 35,730 current international $ against 35,700 current international $ in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita, ppp between Chile and Montenegro?
- 30 current international $, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for gni per capita, ppp?
- Chile ranks 69th and Montenegro ranks 70th of 202 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), published as GNI per capita, PPP (current international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator provides values for gross national income (GNI) per person expressed in current international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.