Georgia vs Serbia: GNI per capita, PPP

Georgia
24,718 constant 2021 international $
in 2025
Serbia
27,050 constant 2021 international $
in 2025
Georgia rank
64th
Serbia rank
62nd

GNI per capita, PPP over time

  • Georgia
  • Serbia
010.0k20.0k30.0k199720112025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 27,050 constant 2021 international $ against 24,718 constant 2021 international $ in Georgia, a difference of 2,332 constant 2021 international $.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 62nd of 159 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 14,253 constant 2021 international $ 17,656 constant 2021 international $ 3,403 constant 2021 international $ Serbia
2020s 20,474 constant 2021 international $ 23,992 constant 2021 international $ 3,518 constant 2021 international $ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni per capita, ppp, Georgia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 27,050 constant 2021 international $ against 24,718 constant 2021 international $ in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni per capita, ppp between Georgia and Serbia?
2,332 constant 2021 international $, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for gni per capita, ppp?
Georgia ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 62nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB), published as GNI per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Serbia: GNI per capita, PPP. Statizoid, drawing on International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-per-capita-ppp-constant-2021-international/georgia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-per-capita-ppp-constant-2021-international/georgia/serbia/">Georgia vs Serbia: GNI per capita, PPP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $)
Unit
constant 2021 international $
Source
International Comparison Program (ICP), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 5,350 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

This indicator provides values for gross national income (GNI) per person expressed in constant international dollars, converted by purchasing power parities (PPPs). PPPs account for the different price levels across countries and thus PPP-based comparisons of economic output are more appropriate for comparing the output of economies and the average material well-being of their inhabitants than exchange-rate based comparisons. Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2021. The PPP conversion factor is a currency conversion factor and a spatial price deflator. PPPs convert different currencies to a common currency and, in the process of conversion, equalize their purchasing power by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries, thereby allowing volume or output comparisons of GDP and its expenditure components.