Europe & Central Asia vs Macau, China: GNI per capita growth
GNI per capita growth over time
- Europe & Central Asia
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 8.1% against 1.4% in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 6.7%.
That makes Macau, China's figure about 5.7 times Europe & Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Macau, China ahead.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 17th and Macau, China ranks 15th of 26 groups.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.1% | 8.1% | 7.0% | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 5.1% | 3.8% | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 2.9% | 1.7% | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita growth, Europe & Central Asia or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 8.1% against 1.4% in Europe & Central Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gni per capita growth between Europe & Central Asia and Macau, China?
- 6.7%, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Macau, China?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Europe & Central Asia and Macau, China rank globally for gni per capita growth?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 17th and Macau, China ranks 15th of 26 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.