Equatorial Guinea vs Isle of Man: GNI per capita growth
GNI per capita growth over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Isle of Man
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 7.7% against 7.4% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Isle of Man's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 18th and Isle of Man ranks 16th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Isle of Man in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Isle of Man | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.9% | 1.3% | 22.6% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -3.9% | 2.2% | 6.2% | Isle of Man |
| 2020s | 1.3% | -2.5% | 3.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita growth, Equatorial Guinea or Isle of Man?
- Isle of Man, at 7.7% against 7.4% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gni per capita growth between Equatorial Guinea and Isle of Man?
- 0.3%, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Isle of Man?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Isle of Man rank globally for gni per capita growth?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 18th and Isle of Man ranks 16th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.