Costa Rica vs Hong Kong, China: GNI per capita growth
GNI per capita growth over time
- Costa Rica
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 3.4% against 3.2% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 71st and Hong Kong, China ranks 68th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.3% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 2.2% | 2.8% | 0.6% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 2.7% | 2.2% | 0.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 2.5% | 1.9% | 0.6% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita growth, Costa Rica or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 3.4% against 3.2% in Costa Rica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita growth between Costa Rica and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.2%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Hong Kong, China?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gni per capita growth?
- Costa Rica ranks 71st and Hong Kong, China ranks 68th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.