Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania: GNI per capita growth
GNI per capita growth over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Tanzania
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 5.1% against 4.9% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tanzania ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.9% | 3.7% | 1.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 3.5% | 0.2% | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 4.1% | 1.8% | 2.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita growth, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tanzania?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 5.1% against 4.9% in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita growth between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania?
- 0.2%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania rank globally for gni per capita growth?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 42nd and Tanzania ranks 43rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.