Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: GNI per capita growth
GNI per capita growth over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 5.2% against 5.1% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 42nd and Kazakhstan ranks 41st of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.9% | 6.8% | 1.9% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 4.2% | 0.9% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 4.0% | 3.5% | 0.5% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita growth, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 5.2% against 5.1% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gni per capita growth between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
- 0.1%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan rank globally for gni per capita growth?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 42nd and Kazakhstan ranks 41st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.