Bhutan vs Latin America & Caribbean: GNI per capita growth
GNI per capita growth over time
- Bhutan
- Latin America & Caribbean
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 9.7% against 1.7% in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 8.0%.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 5.7 times Latin America & Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Latin America & Caribbean ahead.
Bhutan ranks 11th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 11th of 167 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Latin America & Caribbean | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.4% | 1.6% | 1.9% | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 7.4% | 1.8% | 5.6% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 4.3% | 1.1% | 3.2% | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 2.0% | 1.5% | 0.5% | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita growth, Bhutan or Latin America & Caribbean?
- Bhutan, at 9.7% against 1.7% in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gni per capita growth between Bhutan and Latin America & Caribbean?
- 8.0%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Latin America & Caribbean?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Latin America & Caribbean rank globally for gni per capita growth?
- Bhutan ranks 11th and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 11th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.