Rwanda vs Serbia: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.57 million current LCU against 1.49 million current LCU in Serbia, a difference of 82,720 current LCU.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 39th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 55,171 current LCU | 13,553 current LCU | 41,619 current LCU | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 179,565 current LCU | 244,645 current LCU | 65,080 current LCU | Serbia |
| 2010s | 509,186 current LCU | 604,436 current LCU | 95,251 current LCU | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.12 million current LCU | 1.16 million current LCU | 35,929 current LCU | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Rwanda, at 1.57 million current LCU against 1.49 million current LCU in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 82,720 current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for gni per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 39th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as GNI per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.