Lithuania vs Puerto Rico: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 28,232 current LCU against 27,496 current LCU in Puerto Rico, a difference of 736 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Lithuania ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 169th of 208 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,787 current LCU | 7,722 current LCU | 5,934 current LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 6,287 current LCU | 13,941 current LCU | 7,654 current LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 12,592 current LCU | 19,384 current LCU | 6,792 current LCU | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 23,280 current LCU | 24,681 current LCU | 1,401 current LCU | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Lithuania or Puerto Rico?
- Lithuania, at 28,232 current LCU against 27,496 current LCU in Puerto Rico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Lithuania and Puerto Rico?
- 736 current LCU, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Puerto Rico?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Puerto Rico rank globally for gni per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 169th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as GNI per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.