Latvia vs Sierra Leone: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Latvia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 23,085 current LCU against 19,046 current LCU in Sierra Leone, a difference of 4,039 current LCU.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 175th and Sierra Leone ranks 178th of 208 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,343 current LCU | 139.56 current LCU | 1,203 current LCU | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6,031 current LCU | 1,204 current LCU | 4,826 current LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | 11,782 current LCU | 4,903 current LCU | 6,879 current LCU | Latvia |
| 2020s | 19,307 current LCU | 13,755 current LCU | 5,552 current LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Latvia or Sierra Leone?
- Latvia, at 23,085 current LCU against 19,046 current LCU in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 4,039 current LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Sierra Leone rank globally for gni per capita?
- Latvia ranks 175th and Sierra Leone ranks 178th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as GNI per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.