Iraq vs Kazakhstan: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Iraq
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 7.10 million current LCU against 7.04 million current LCU in Iraq, a difference of 57,310 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 208 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 509,334 current LCU | 72,895 current LCU | 436,439 current LCU | Iraq |
| 2000s | 2.82 million current LCU | 464,333 current LCU | 2.36 million current LCU | Iraq |
| 2010s | 6.37 million current LCU | 2.10 million current LCU | 4.27 million current LCU | Iraq |
| 2020s | 7.39 million current LCU | 5.02 million current LCU | 2.37 million current LCU | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Iraq or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 7.10 million current LCU against 7.04 million current LCU in Iraq as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Iraq and Kazakhstan?
- 57,310 current LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
- How do Iraq and Kazakhstan rank globally for gni per capita?
- Iraq ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as GNI per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.