Armenia vs Tanzania: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Armenia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 3.56 million current LCU against 3.27 million current LCU in Tanzania, a difference of 283,350 current LCU.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania ahead.
Armenia ranks 26th and Tanzania ranks 29th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 131,675 current LCU | 147,005 current LCU | 15,330 current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 729,516 current LCU | 546,356 current LCU | 183,159 current LCU | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1.69 million current LCU | 1.74 million current LCU | 49,917 current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 2.84 million current LCU | 2.84 million current LCU | 5,393 current LCU | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Armenia or Tanzania?
- Armenia, at 3.56 million current LCU against 3.27 million current LCU in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Armenia and Tanzania?
- 283,350 current LCU, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Tanzania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Armenia and Tanzania rank globally for gni per capita?
- Armenia ranks 26th and Tanzania ranks 29th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as GNI per capita (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.