Mauritania vs Poland: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Mauritania
- Poland
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 67,866 constant LCU against 67,439 constant LCU in Poland, a difference of 427 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 87th and Poland ranks 89th of 169 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42,134 constant LCU | 23,864 constant LCU | 18,270 constant LCU | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 45,561 constant LCU | 31,564 constant LCU | 13,997 constant LCU | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 56,224 constant LCU | 45,561 constant LCU | 10,663 constant LCU | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 64,836 constant LCU | 62,240 constant LCU | 2,596 constant LCU | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Mauritania or Poland?
- Mauritania, at 67,866 constant LCU against 67,439 constant LCU in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Mauritania and Poland?
- 427 constant LCU, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Poland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Mauritania and Poland rank globally for gni per capita?
- Mauritania ranks 87th and Poland ranks 89th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.