Latvia vs Panama: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Latvia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 17,257 constant LCU against 16,381 constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 876 constant LCU.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Panama ahead.
Latvia ranks 136th and Panama ranks 134th of 169 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,159 constant LCU | 6,130 constant LCU | 971.09 constant LCU | Panama |
| 2000s | 9,027 constant LCU | 7,903 constant LCU | 1,124 constant LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | 12,775 constant LCU | 13,316 constant LCU | 540.19 constant LCU | Panama |
| 2020s | 16,023 constant LCU | 15,484 constant LCU | 539.16 constant LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Latvia or Panama?
- Panama, at 17,257 constant LCU against 16,381 constant LCU in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Latvia and Panama?
- 876 constant LCU, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for gni per capita?
- Latvia ranks 136th and Panama ranks 134th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.