Argentina vs Latvia: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Argentina
- Latvia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 16,951 constant LCU against 16,381 constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 570 constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 135th and Latvia ranks 136th of 169 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,763 constant LCU | 5,027 constant LCU | 7,736 constant LCU | Argentina |
| 2000s | 12,855 constant LCU | 9,027 constant LCU | 3,828 constant LCU | Argentina |
| 2010s | 16,757 constant LCU | 12,775 constant LCU | 3,981 constant LCU | Argentina |
| 2020s | 15,823 constant LCU | 16,023 constant LCU | 200.14 constant LCU | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Argentina or Latvia?
- Argentina, at 16,951 constant LCU against 16,381 constant LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Argentina and Latvia?
- 570 constant LCU, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Latvia rank globally for gni per capita?
- Argentina ranks 135th and Latvia ranks 136th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.