Equatorial Guinea vs Kosovo: GNI per capita
GNI per capita over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 5,856 constant 2015 US$ against 5,686 constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 170 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Kosovo ranks 85th of 160 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,666 constant 2015 US$ | 2,685 constant 2015 US$ | 8,981 constant 2015 US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 8,219 constant 2015 US$ | 3,565 constant 2015 US$ | 4,654 constant 2015 US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 5,321 constant 2015 US$ | 4,907 constant 2015 US$ | 413.64 constant 2015 US$ | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 5,856 constant 2015 US$ against 5,686 constant 2015 US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gni per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Kosovo?
- 170 constant 2015 US$, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kosovo?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Kosovo rank globally for gni per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Kosovo ranks 85th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GNI per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.