Cuba vs Georgia: GNI: linked series
GNI: linked series over time
- Cuba
- Georgia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 101.87 billion current LCU against 98.04 billion current LCU in Georgia, a difference of 3.84 billion current LCU.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 146th and Georgia ranks 147th of 206 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.74 billion current LCU | 2.33 billion current LCU | 19.41 billion current LCU | Cuba |
| 2000s | 43.90 billion current LCU | 12.04 billion current LCU | 31.86 billion current LCU | Cuba |
| 2010s | 83.08 billion current LCU | 33.39 billion current LCU | 49.70 billion current LCU | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni: linked series, Cuba or Georgia?
- Cuba, at 101.87 billion current LCU against 98.04 billion current LCU in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gni: linked series between Cuba and Georgia?
- 3.84 billion current LCU, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Georgia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Georgia rank globally for gni: linked series?
- Cuba ranks 146th and Georgia ranks 147th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GNI: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.