Aruba vs Greenland: GNI: linked series
GNI: linked series over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 11.12 billion current LCU against 7.05 billion current LCU in Aruba, a difference of 4.06 billion current LCU.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.6 times Aruba's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 181st and Greenland ranks 178th of 206 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.04 billion current LCU | 6.47 billion current LCU | 4.43 billion current LCU | Greenland |
| 2000s | 3.60 billion current LCU | 9.49 billion current LCU | 5.89 billion current LCU | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gni: linked series, Aruba or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 11.12 billion current LCU against 7.05 billion current LCU in Aruba as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gni: linked series between Aruba and Greenland?
- 4.06 billion current LCU, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2007.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for gni: linked series?
- Aruba ranks 181st and Greenland ranks 178th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GNI: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national income is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.