Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong, China: GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia
0.9945 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia rank
11th
Hong Kong, China rank
11th

GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Hong Kong, China
00.250.50.751196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9945 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0.1055 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Europe & Central Asia ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 11th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 4 and Hong Kong, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1960s 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0054 current US$ per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia
1970s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9943 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0192 current US$ per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia
1980s 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9789 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0273 current US$ per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia
1990s 0.9984 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9952 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia
2000s 0.9967 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0267 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.9961 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0326 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.9952 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0846 current US$ per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.1 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9945 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong, China?
0.1055 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong, China?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gni (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong, China: GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong, China: GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
255 places, 13,841 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.