Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs New Caledonia: GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.9812 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
New Caledonia
1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
28th
New Caledonia rank
26th

GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • New Caledonia
00.250.50.751196519952025

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9812 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0488 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 28th and New Caledonia ranks 26th of 45 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9991 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9726 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0266 current US$ per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2000s 0.9782 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.04 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0583 current US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2010s 0.9763 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.04 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0679 current US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2020s 0.9783 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0557 current US$ per US$ of GDP New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 1.03 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9812 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and New Caledonia?
0.0488 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and New Caledonia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and New Caledonia rank globally for gni (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 28th and New Caledonia ranks 26th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs New Caledonia: GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/new-caledonia/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs New Caledonia: GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
255 places, 13,841 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.