Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre

Tanzania, United Republic of
87,530 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
91,820 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
169th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

GNI (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 91,820 current US$ per square kilometre against 87,530 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 4,290 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 4,483 current US$ per square kilometre 2,787 current US$ per square kilometre 1,696 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 6,486 current US$ per square kilometre 8,593 current US$ per square kilometre 2,107 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 12,695 current US$ per square kilometre 15,629 current US$ per square kilometre 2,934 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 9,532 current US$ per square kilometre 14,104 current US$ per square kilometre 4,572 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 21,130 current US$ per square kilometre 11,150 current US$ per square kilometre 9,979 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 52,287 current US$ per square kilometre 59,797 current US$ per square kilometre 7,511 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 80,763 current US$ per square kilometre 95,535 current US$ per square kilometre 14,773 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per square kilometre, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 91,820 current US$ per square kilometre against 87,530 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per square kilometre between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
4,290 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,003 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.