Sub-Saharan Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre

Sub-Saharan Africa
86,316 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
4.97 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
37th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
37th

GNI (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Trinidad and Tobago
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 4.97 million current US$ per square kilometre against 86,316 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 4.88 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 57.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 45 groups.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1980s 15,843 current US$ per square kilometre 936,429 current US$ per square kilometre 920,587 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 20,609 current US$ per square kilometre 995,323 current US$ per square kilometre 974,714 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 37,426 current US$ per square kilometre 2.84 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.81 million current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 71,194 current US$ per square kilometre 4.74 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.67 million current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 86,306 current US$ per square kilometre 4.57 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.48 million current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per square kilometre, Sub-Saharan Africa or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 4.97 million current US$ per square kilometre against 86,316 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per square kilometre between Sub-Saharan Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
4.88 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
39 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 37th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 37th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/trinidad-and-tobago/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,003 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.