OECD members vs Singapore: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre

OECD members
1.84 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
573.75 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
3rd
Singapore rank
2nd

GNI (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • OECD members
  • Singapore
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 573.75 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.84 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 571.91 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 311.0 times OECD members's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 45 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 45,972 current US$ per square kilometre 1.66 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.62 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 133,039 current US$ per square kilometre 7.60 million current US$ per square kilometre 7.46 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 327,269 current US$ per square kilometre 28.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 28.09 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 666,098 current US$ per square kilometre 108.39 million current US$ per square kilometre 107.73 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 1.02 million current US$ per square kilometre 187.15 million current US$ per square kilometre 186.12 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 1.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 417.00 million current US$ per square kilometre 415.59 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 1.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 525.34 million current US$ per square kilometre 523.64 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per square kilometre, OECD members or Singapore?
Singapore, at 573.75 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.84 million current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per square kilometre between OECD members and Singapore?
571.91 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do OECD members and Singapore rank globally for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
OECD members ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Singapore: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/">OECD members vs Singapore: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,003 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.