Indonesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre

Indonesia
705,336 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
785,960 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
100th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
97th

GNI (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196719952023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 785,960 current US$ per square kilometre against 705,336 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 80,624 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Indonesia ranks 100th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 97th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 15,296 current US$ per square kilometre 55,922 current US$ per square kilometre 40,626 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 44,043 current US$ per square kilometre 92,073 current US$ per square kilometre 48,029 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 83,038 current US$ per square kilometre 98,944 current US$ per square kilometre 15,906 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 160,712 current US$ per square kilometre 130,928 current US$ per square kilometre 29,784 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 482,309 current US$ per square kilometre 301,414 current US$ per square kilometre 180,896 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 635,500 current US$ per square kilometre 624,743 current US$ per square kilometre 10,758 current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 785,960 current US$ per square kilometre against 705,336 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
80,624 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 100th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Indonesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,003 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.