Europe & Central Asia vs Israel: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre

Europe & Central Asia
1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
23.61 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
11th
Israel rank
11th

GNI (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Israel
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 23.61 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 22.61 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 23.5 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Israel ranks 11th of 45 groups.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 126,452 current US$ per square kilometre 201,746 current US$ per square kilometre 75,294 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1970s 410,689 current US$ per square kilometre 644,994 current US$ per square kilometre 234,304 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1980s 921,076 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 million current US$ per square kilometre 656,626 current US$ per square kilometre Israel
1990s 630,915 current US$ per square kilometre 4.37 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.74 million current US$ per square kilometre Israel
2000s 586,706 current US$ per square kilometre 7.29 million current US$ per square kilometre 6.70 million current US$ per square kilometre Israel
2010s 814,249 current US$ per square kilometre 14.50 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.69 million current US$ per square kilometre Israel
2020s 921,235 current US$ per square kilometre 22.32 million current US$ per square kilometre 21.40 million current US$ per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gni (current us$), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia or Israel?
Israel, at 23.61 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.01 million current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gni (current us$), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia and Israel?
22.61 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Israel rank globally for gni (current us$), per square kilometre?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Israel ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Israel: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gni-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/israel/">Europe & Central Asia vs Israel: GNI (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GNI (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
254 places, 13,003 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GNI (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.